every match i play (on singleplayer) i win wethet it take minutes,hours,days,weeks. i always win cause the enemy AI never seems to even attempt to assault bases unlees weve just recently taken them i dont know if im the only one.
Also can you improve on stealth? i like sneaking behind enemie lines and stuff but someone sees me cause AI have longer sight range then me or just turns around and shoots me

As far as AI aggression goes, I have a similar issue. I wrote about it in an earlier thread: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=134&p=980#p980

Things have been improved since then, but not nearly enough. I still have similar problems, where friendly troops are gathered in little clumps far away from where all the action is when they are sorely needed elsewhere.

In a match I played just now, the enemy formed an overwhelming assault on one of the central trenches. They took almost complete control over it relatively quickly, and the friendly troops stationed there got pushed back from overwhelming numbers. Sensibly enough, the AI Commander ordered the trench retaken, and what followed was an exercise in pure, infuriating incompetence. I dutifully headed for the yellow objective marker on the minimap, and waited for friendlies. Nothing happened for ages, while the enemies peacefully just reinforced their position more and more. Finally, a small friendly sortie entered from the north, and made a pitiful, half-arsed attempt at assaulting the enemy position. Naturally, they failed spectacularly, and I literally felt embarrassed to be on their side - that's not even hyperbole. Meanwhile, of course, the entire rest of my army just sat there like a bunch of cunts.

I knew I needed to keep the pressure on that spot, otherwise they could just fan out from that central position and overwhelm us at other points - there must have been at least fifty of them, swarming like ants. But since I was only Rank 2, I had no means with which to gather a significant enough number of friendlies from the locations where they were sitting inactively around like the bunch of criminally incompetent shits that they were, so I was at a loss.

However, the game has this system where the AI will react to gunfire, and come running to the location of the shooting. So what I did, was run up to a bunch of friendlies, fire a few shots with my rifle, and have them all come running towards me. Then I would run a few steps more, fire my rifle again to make sure they keep following, and repeat from there. It was bloody ridiculous. I should not be forced to exploit the game's system just to have the AI do what they should already be doing in the first place.

Obviously, this was nowhere near enough. I eventually ragequit, with the trench still in enemy hands.

I'm not entirely sure where the problem lies - is it with the AI Commander or the AI of the individual soldiers on the map? Or possibly some mixture of the two? I'm not entirely sure how the system works - does the objective marker you see on the map count as the objective for all the friendly troops as well, or are they given separate orders the player don't get to see? What I do know, however, is that there was quite literally no excuse for the friendly AI to behave like they did. They were not in combat, they had no need to defend the locations they were sitting at, because they were far away from the frontline, and they fulfilled no function, whatsoever.

Funnily enough, I haven't really had this problem on the two smaller maps. Just that large one.

As for the actual topic of winning every match in the end, I can easily see that happening.

The thing is that all the AI soldiers are even in skill regardless of faction, so starting with even bases, the game will probably never end that way, just some odd base captures happening for one side or the other, if you just let the AI fight. The game is also designed to stay pretty even in terms of difficulty even if one faction manages to capture the majority of bases.

With this in mind, the only way to really lose in the single player game is to intervene with AI playing together and by playing worse than the AI in general. If you are better than an average AI soldier, you will inevitably win the game, it just takes varying amount of time.

In the future, there might be some changes in this. Another recent topic was touching the idea of having individual settings for each faction, so that you could e.g. make the enemy AI accuracy better / bigger man count than what your faction AI has, which would give you some extra difficulty and should make the enemy faction more stronger over your faction. Another feature I'm planning is enabling more than 2 factions in a single match. The factions might be set as allies, so you could face a situation that your faction is being attacked from multiple directions by different factions.

The AI commander makes defense the top priority, so firstly it allocates soldiers in the bases, then on the borders, and everyone alive after that are allocated for the attack. The AI only attacks in one location, and the attack squads are distributed randomly at the 9 blocks surrounding the attack start marker.

I think that might be your main problem, right there. An AI that makes defense its top priority doesn't exactly make for fun gameplay.

I don't know if this has been suggested before, but what about letting the player choose between a series of different AI aggression-levels for each faction? Like for example "Defensive", "Aggressive" and "Balanced"?

"Defensive" could be something similar to what we have now. "Aggressive" would be the exact opposite, making it first priority to attack the enemy and only leave a few soldiers in defense almost as an afterthought. "Balanced" should try to hit the sweet-spot between the two - at all times focusing on taking the fight to the enemy and expand its territory, but still try to have enough troops in defense to not be caught off-guard easily. (But only in the bases closest to the enemy.)

Of course, that idea isn't really worth much unless you make it possible for the AI to attack several places on the map at once. Otherwise, you could have a zillion of these different "AI Personalities", and the game still wouldn't be much fun.